As I've mentioned here many times and in my books, I'm a big fan of the .22 rimfire when it comes to all around hunting and survival weapons. While there are many circumstances where other, more potent calibers are certainly needed, the lowly .22 rimfire does a good job as an all-around game getter and many experienced hunters and wilderness travelers would agree that if they could only have one gun, they might reach for their trusty .22, especially since so much ammunition can be carried in a small space. I've always been more of a rifleman than a handgunner myself, and most anyone would have better results putting meat on the table with an accurate long gun than a pistol or revolver, but if one of these two fine rimfire handguns were my own, I think I'd invest the time and effort into getting as proficient as possible with it.
These are not mine, however, but I'm temporarily in possession of them as a friend who is out of the country shipped them to me for safekeeping until he can pick them up. What you see here is a Ruger Single Six revolver in .22 Magnum, and the classic Colt Woodsman .22 Long Rifle automatic pistol:
Both of these models have long been popular with serious handgun hunters and marksmen, and either would do a fine job of bagging small game in the hands of a competent shooter. The Colt Woodsman, in particular has a perfectly-balanced feel in the hand and a silky slick action. Unlike many of today's lightweight .22 automatics, this is a pistol that is built to last and to be handed down through the generations. The Woodsman is getting harder to find these days, and if you do find one, it won't be cheap. Both of these came in old school fitted leather holsters, reminding me of the .22 revolver that was the first handgun I ever fired under my dad's watchful eye:
I might get better results with my 10/22 carbine, but I'd sure like to have either one of these in my bug out bag as well if I had to take off to the woods for an extended stay.
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Note: This checklist includes the items I would take in a bug-out situation in which I had to head out into the wilds of the Lower 48 State...
-
The feasibility of any bug out plan depends a lot on your starting point. Obviously, some regions of the country have more to offer than ot...
-
Whether considering a rifle for the bug out bag or for other purposes, I have a strong preference for short, handy carbines, and few rifles ...
-
The Ruger 10/22 is an all-time favorite among many rimfire enthusiasts, and for good reason. It's a reasonably priced, lightweight, rel...
-
I see a lot of discussion on survival forums and blogs about the options available for radio communication among small groups in a post-SHTF...
-
Here's an interesting product if you're using a Jeep or some kind of off-road capable SUV or pickup as a bug-out vehicle and would l...
-
I might have mentioned here before that I like guns. If not, I'll say it now. Not all of them have to be about bugging out or even abo...
-
I'm reposting this update from my main site, www.scottbwilliams.com for those of you who only check in here. As many of you know, The ...
-
My publisher is sponsoring a book giveaway of 10 copies of The Prepper's Workbook on Goodreads. You can enter to win one right here. ...
-
Bug out bag checklists usually focus on a full-sized kit of everything you would need for at least the first 72-hours after leaving home. I...
My owned a Ruger Super Single-Six since 1973, it was my 'firstest handgun ever'. Great gun, it has a lot to recommend it, I've carried it quite a few miles. Built like a tank. That one appears to be an original Single-Six, the model that loads with hammer at half cock position. The Supers load with hammer closed.
ReplyDeleteI could never afford the Colt - I wish I could but not in the cards. Great design, I believe John Browning had a hand in this one. Nice gun.
Thanks for the pics, your friend has great taste!
Walther P22 is also a dependable weapon. Cheaper than many "name brands" and has 10 shot capacity.
ReplyDelete